Now showing at
the Definitely Superior Art Gallery, in all three of its exhibition spaces, is
the work of fifteen Lakehead University Fine Art Department Faculty professors
and instructors. They are: Roly
Martin, Sarah Link, Alison Kendall, Mark Nisenholt, Ann Clarke, Mavourneen
Trainor, Kasia Piech, Julie Cosgrove, Sam Shahsahabi, Quentin Maki, Janet
Clark, Peter Wragg, Heather Cranston, Caitlyn McMillan, Dr. Andrea Terry and
Hannah Guthrie.
Although there is a mix of individual
explorations of styles, styles accrued over time requiring lots of thought and
experimentation, these works also represent a variety of contemporary/modern visual
styles influenced by the fine art world, a world most frequently seen in the big
galleries and museums of bigger city centers.
Most of us, the
public, get to peek at these works in big coffee table books. This is a great
opportunity to see this kind of work live and up close.
For anyone
interested in the visual arts as a hobby or career choice, this is also an
opportunity to get a sampling of the philosophical directions that the Lakehead
University Fine Arts department takes towards the visual arts. There is here,
as the very nature of “Fine Art” implies, the avoidance of the commercial and
popular arts. It’s pretty clear that if a student of visual art were looking to
illustrate a graphic novel, work in the movies, or get involved in commercial
design, Lakehead Univervisty might not be the place to go. However, it is still
possible to be inspired by the different approaches, no matter where your
interests lay.
Judging a show
like this on its own merits is a bit like judging the dance of another tribe.
One has to understand the language the tribe has developed for itself. Although
the public still has some difficulty with the translation, the public is more
and more accepting of it.
This show
represents pure gallery art, which is collectable and predominantly about personal
artistic statements, or art itself and/or its history, like an intellectual onion
with lots of layers rather than obviously sporting any contemporary political or
social subject matter. However, for artists leaning more towards popular and
commercial art, there is great value in seeing a variety of approaches to creating
pictures and sculptures whatever the subject may be.
For instance,
Quentin Maki’s painting “Undertow” has a wonderful surface of texture and
glazes that is rich and vibrant. Imagine if entire walls were created with this
surface and pillars and costumes for an elaborate theatre production. It would
be awesome.
Mark Nisenholt’s
Sproing series of digital prints employ great crosshatching and other technical
skills beautifully employed to create imaginary landscapes. Similar to his
series of globes, the approach could have multiple uses for other fields of art
– rock album covers, book covers, posters, etc.
Caitlin Jean
McMillan’s collage works for “Irrational Body” are both a bit repellent and
attractive. Imagine these as backdrops for a graphic zombie novel or The
Walking Dead. Images like these could represent the state of mind of a
character or play as a background while main characters discuss the morality of
conquering a neighboring town.
Mavourneen
Trainer’s “The Deconstrution of a Dragonfly: A Maximalist Approach,” is an
acrylic work that in its beauty immediately conjures up feelings of the
adventure of finding new places. The images are of both landscape and mindscape
and could be used for an alternative approach to creating children’s book
illustrations, or making delightful posters, etc.
And this can be
done with all works in the gallery. It’s a great show. For with a bit of
imagination and with a spirit of play, one can read the works for their own
inherent merits and/or get inspiration for their own approach to art. Such is
the history of art, where much of art’s value lies in the never-ending use and
reuse of multiple approaches to creating interesting work.